The book’s opening lines at this Faber page

That’s just fine. 


And if you have access, there’s a review article in The Sunday Times: 

Pooch poetry in furry follow-up to TS Eliot’s cats


On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 2:00 PM Ken Armstrong <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

Yes, one has to wonder what would constitute "fully connecting." The Vulcan Mind Meld? It's probably not the dog that needs pity, but the confused mind that thinks it does. The human comedy at work.


On 10/29/2018 1:21 PM, [log in to unmask] wrote:
You may not own a dog or more appropriately a dog may not own you and cannot fully grasp the connectivity.

Sent from my iPhone

On Oct 29, 2018, at 1:14 PM, Chanan Mittal <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

Well, there are far too many resonances to Eliot’s collection. I haven’t read this one on dogs. Hope this is good too in its own way.


On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 12:52 PM [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
Thank you CR but I am not positive this new poet or poetry has the requisite understanding or empathy.  See this quoted paragraph's conclusion:

Dig deeper, however, and it becomes clear why the Eliot estate contacted him. “I did put a lot of dogs in my other poems – I hadn’t actually realised there were so many until an American journalist pointed it out,” he admits “Why were there so many? I think it’s because there’s something slightly tragic and poignant about the relationship between humans and dogs – the way that they try to greet you but you can’t completely connect.”

Sent from my iPhone

On Oct 29, 2018, at 11:50 AM, Chanan Mittal <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

In Old Possum’s footsteps 

First Macavity the cat, now Molly the mutt: the sequel TS Eliot dreamed of writing | Books | The Guardian