Print

Print


Appreciated your concern, Kate. It just struck me that I could as well put
my posts in a bold format.

Regards,
CR

On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 8:05 PM Kate Nichols <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

> CR, wasn’t anything against you. I was just thinking of what Carroll wrote
> awhile ago about not being able to see much and thought that if I could, I
> would visit him often during the week and read books and poetry to him.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Apr 19, 2018, at 7:55 PM, Chanan Mittal <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> Let me post it all again in a larger print:
>
>
> I suppose it has to do with Eliot and Richards holding opposing views on
> literature, science, and dogma vis-a-vis Dante.
>
>
> Possibly the debate had to do with Eliot’s 1927 essay in The Dial titled
>
> Literature, Science, and Dogma.
>
>
> As well as Richards’ ‘Science and Poetry’ (1926, 1935).
>
>
> CR
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 7:50 PM Chanan Mittal <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> As well as Richards’ ‘Science and Poetry’ (1926, 1935).
>>
>>
>> CR
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 6:45 PM Chanan Mittal <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>>> Possibly the debate had to do with Eliot’s 1927 essay in The Dial titled
>>> Literature, Science, and Dogma.
>>>
>>> CR
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 6:36 PM Chanan Mittal <[log in to unmask]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Carrol,
>>>>
>>>> I suppose it has to do with Eliot and Richards holding opposing views
>>>> on literature, science, and dogma vis-a-vis Dante.
>>>>
>>>> Please peruse:
>>>>
>>>> Literature, Science, and Dogma: T. S. Eliot and I. A. Richards on Dante
>>>> - Dominic Manganiello, 1993
>>>>
>>>> http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/014833319304300106
>>>>
>>>> CR
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 4:56 PM Cox, Carrol <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I vaguely remember this from around 65 years ago, in a t ext
>>>>> referencing some years earlier. I.A. Richards, as I remember, had listed a
>>>>> few things that one should contemplate, and one of those items was
>>>>> considering the immense magnitude  of the galaxies, or something like that.
>>>>> And Eliot responded with some sort of sneer. Obviously I'm pretty vague on
>>>>> this. Can anyone give  more  information?
>>>>>
>>>>> Carrol
>>>>>
>>>>