Print

Print


Yup! From nothing to nothing we proceed.
All best.
CR

On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 3:14 PM Cox, Carrol <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> To say that P reflects Q, one must first know both P & Q independently. I
> cannot say an elm reflects an oak tree unless I am familiar with both trees.
>
> Hence the statement that a poem reflects the "personality" of the poet
> unless I already know that "personality" from other sources.
>
> The whole discussion is neither false nor true but merely empty of content.
>
> Carrol
>
>