Print

Print


Eliot would certainly find a certain affinity with cats, a little
more detached, distant, quiet and indifferent, at least apparently.

CR

On Wednesday, October 7, 2015, Nancy Gish <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> That is simply not true. Anyone who is loving to cats is loved in return,
> and they are wonderful companions. They act differently than dogs, but they
> are not less connected or companionable--as Eliot clearly knew.
>
> Anyone who loves cats will tell you that, so I won't bore you with a
> series of stories about my very loving, companionable, and wonderful cat
> friends.
> Nancy
>
> >>> Chanan Mittal 10/07/15 10:35 AM >>>
> Certainly much more companionable.
>
> CR
>
> On Wednesday, October 7, 2015, Ken Armstrong <[log in to unmask]
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml',[log in to unmask]);>> wrote:
>
>> So much for loyal companions. ;->
>>
>> On October 7, 2015 6:58:49 AM EDT, "Rickard A. Parker" <
>> [log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, 6 Oct 2015 23:50:18 -0400, Chanan Mittal <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>
>>> T.S. Eliot really liked cats according to his wife - NY Daily News
>>>> http://m.nydailynews.com/entertainment/cats-premieres-broadway-1982-article-1.2383482
>>>>
>>>
>>> "Cats are fine," says Valerie Eliot. "But actually, I think I prefer dogs."
>>>
>>>