Dear Kate,
I did not mean dogs are, by nature, pathetic. I meant that even a kicked
dog will be loving, and that makes them pathetically vulnerable. Kicking
a dog is especially disgusting just because of that.

>>> Kate Nichols  12/22/14 9:29 PM >>>
Nancy, dogs aren't pathetically loving.  Their love is a gift and I
find it pathetic at all.  I love your use of the word "sentient,"
I cannot help but think of "Data" from Star Trek fame when I see or hear
that word.

from Nancy:  I think kicking sentient
creatures is genuine bad. (Yes there are degrees, but dogs are
pathetically loving and accepting, not objects to abuse

On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 5:10 PM, P  wrote:

> And when China takes over as nation #1 under all major headings, it
> well become de rigueur to have on most restaurant menus the form of
> nourishment known as dog. In western Canada the industry of bug
farming is
> thriving. It was I believe in the years before WWII the many store
> in Canada had a sign reading "No Englishman Need Apply";
> why, I have no idea.
> Life goes on.
> Peter
> David Boyd  wrote:
> Nancy
> As early as the mid/late 1960's, when a 16 year old David joined the
> British Foreign Office / Diplomatic Service, women selected for same
> required to resign when or if they got married, whereas had I got
> my wife and family would have been generously funded on any overseas
> postings.
> Was this policy outrageously unfair to women and just plain wrong? -
> of course it was. But did that make the British Government of the era
> culpable?
> That was then, and this is now, surely?
> I do most respectfully suggest that you seem to be unduly-zealous in
> condemning past generations for their failure to march to your own,
> very-different, 2014, moral compass and that there is little to be
> except perhaps for feelings of self-righteousness in doing so: many
> of morality etc surely are indeed relative, according to the era and
> mores involved?
> And BTW it was Alan *Turing* who fell foul of  that draconian 1950's
> law enforcement re homosexuality?
> On 21 December 2014 at 22:04, Nancy Gish  wrote:
>> Well, one does not inhale second-hand gay--even if it mattered.
>> I'm feeling more than ambivalent about Peter's wish that he did not
>> his hero's moral failings. One can, of course, acknowledge good
>> in someone who also had major failings. Pound was a Fascist, but then
>> was not teaching it to children or college students. And either way
>> does not change the value of his poetry. If anyone turned to Fascism
>> because of his broadcasts, it might alter any judgment.
>> But that young woman who deserved the top prize in pathology
>> did not get it, and she was hurt by his bigotry. That is a serious
>> difference. So, too, was the young gay man who, I gather, lost his
>> These actions do have major impact. Think of Alan Turling who was a
>> major factor in winning WWII but hounded out of work and destroyed:
>> "In 1952, Turing was arrested and tried for homosexuality, then a
>> criminal offence. To avoid prison, he accepted injections of
>> for a year, which were intended to neutralise his libido. In that
>> homosexuals were considered a security risk as they were open to
>> blackmail. Turing's security clearance was withdrawn, meaning he
>> no longer work for GCHQ, the post-war successor to Bletchley Park.
>> He committed suicide on 7 June, 1954."
>> Is total relativism really ok--any more than total "thought policing"
>> when prejudice can do that?
>> I'm not suggesting an answer--it's a question.
>> Nancy
>> >>> Kate Nichols  12/21/14 4:17 PM >>>
>> My Professor in college who taught the Modernist class was an open
>> homosexual and smoked cigarettes in the classroom.  Amusing that in
>> today's
>> society, his being gay would not matter at all and would not be used
>> On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Peter Dillane
>> wrote:
>> > Hi Folks,
>> >
>> > I seem to be tainted with cynicism and moral relativism in this
>> company
>> > where everyone has such concern about the issues. Barry Spurr is a
>> > political player not some dear little thing with wide eyes cruelly
>> hunted
>> > down. He was engaged in the political game at the big end of town
>> in
>> > this country that is a brutally combative polar dialectic without
>> nuance. I
>> > find it hard to believe someone could get the job he had without
>> knowing
>> > the score. The past thirty years in this country one or the other
>> of
>> > cultural politics has used its time in power to end the careers of
>> > other side. Neither has the moral call on track record. He had a
>> government
>> > role which will deprive others of their careers perhaps for good. I
>> not
>> > particularly partisan in this  (probably I was on his side in much
>> it
>> > )but my point is  that this is not the story of an ingenue
>> > crushed on the wheel. I think it does matter that he has said these
>> things.
>> > I don’t think the public interest argument is a strong
>> for
>> > disseminating these private conversations although someone who
>> cared
>> > for the national curriculum and was opposed to his position would
>> it
>> > more substantial as a justification for publishing.
>> >
>> > For the record in terms of him being hounded I have not noticed
>> > anyone much cares, there’s been a tiny hue and no cry really. He
>> resigned
>> > and was not dismissed. I suppose he has been pushed but the public
>> fact is
>> > that he jumped and his University has chosen not to say much at
>> His
>> > political masters have said next to nothing but they did not back
>> up.
>> > Part of what he was reported to have said had a tilt at them so he
>> be a
>> > bit friendless.  The racist comments were not particularly vile the
>> > misogynist ones were. Reading between the lines he has accepted a
>> pretty
>> > lame settlement with the publishers on the proviso they publish no
>> more so
>> > there must be more -  and worse. It doesn’t matter that these were
>> private,
>> > nor that he should have known about the porous cyber conduit he was
>> using.
>> > What is is. He chose at a good age with a life of profession> I was
>> taught by a terrific chap. a professor of Pathology. Erudite,
>> > astute, lovely educational technique, approachable and charming.
>> was
>> > a prize for the top of the year in Pathology. This prize was more
>> > itself because it opened doors in your career path. A friend of
>> worked
>> > in the next room to that in which the prize was being discussed by
>> > professors  one year and heard my hero professor say “Clearly the
>> > student on performance is this young woman, but she is a young
>> and it
>> > will be wasted on her.” I still recall some of his lectures and
>> broader
>> > moral stands on issues as very worthy. I do wish I could have them
>> > untainted by the knowledge of what is.
>> >
>> > On another occasion I was talking to a lecturer in the English
>> Department
>> > where I studied in the 1970s and said I very much admired the
>> > professor who could recite great mountains of Njal’s saga or Morte
>> D’Arthur
>> > from heart and sometimes he became teary during these performances
>> what
>> > a terrific person he was and so on. She said to me “Mmm yes I guess
>> does
>> > have some engaging features but during the 50s he disposed of one
>> academic
>> > who was giving trouble by recording a conversation in which the man
>> > admitted to being homosexual." I wish I didn’t know that bit too.
>> >
>> > By the way Jim you mentioned that you hoped this wouldn’t tarnish
>> > Australia. Mate the way we are treating refugees on the high seas
>> our
>> > North and our Interna>> > hard acts to follow in the tarnishing department.
>> >
>> > Cheers Folks
>> >
>> > Pete
>> --
>> Karen "Kate" Nichols
>> Premier Florida Realty of SWFL
>> C: 239-849-3064
>> F: 239-463-4826
>> Search SW Florida homes


Karen "Kate" Nichols
Premier Florida Realty of SWFL
C: 239-849-3064
F: 239-463-4826
Search SW Florida homes