Yes, you got me right. Perhaps their close connection in Anglo-Catholicism had something to do with it.

Ken Armstrong <[log in to unmask]> wrote:


  I don't have any great stake in this, but when I read Alzina Stone Dale's bio-lit appreciation of Eliot (a wonderful little tonic for the negative agenda-driven tomes that proliferate now. And then.), I had your dislike of Browne in mind when she mentioned that Eliot's relationship with Browne spanned quite a few years and he, Eliot, seemed willingly to use Browne as an authoritative and friendly sounding board for projects E was pursuing or thinking of embarking on. I really don't think that negates your take on the matter, but it does for me throw another question mark into the mix. When you say below that "he insisted on strict realism" you are referring to E, right? "Too down and dusty" is Eliot's way as influenced by Browne? Just to be sure I understand.

Ken A

P S The Dale book is T S Eliot The Philosopher Poet. She seems to be a Dorothy Sayers and G. K. Chesterton expert, and you get more of them in their relation to E than you do elsewhere, a nice shift in perspective..

On 9/15/2014 8:44 PM, Peter Montgomery wrote:
Further thought:
Modern reality is very subjective, very internal. I suppose an interesting production might come
of moving in and out of Ibsen's world from and to a more stylistic presentation, perhaps
to create an internal environment that reflects the language instead of dominating it.
through lights and sound.Cf. Sweeney A. Not perhaps Eliot's cup of tea (he insisted on strict
realism, but his way (influence of Browne)is getting just too down & dusty.

This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.