Print

Print


This makes no sense, since it obliterates the struggle in those poems to grasp (fine images for) the _intersection_ of a hypothetical timeless with time. The Timeless itself is by definition unknowable. I suppose some way-out heretics dream of a direct knowledge of the timeless.

After rereading those poems about 3 times a week for two or three years (back in the late '50) I finally decided that they were an interesting failure with some striking passages.

Carrol