Print

Print


Lets see, Spinoza died when he was 45 but, of course, he was not a professor.  Perhaps we could extend the ban on professors to 70 and have no limit on lens grinners.

Richard Seddon
[log in to unmask]



On Oct 28, 2013, at 9:38 AM, Ken Armstrong <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Come to think of it, if we are to have as many books on Shakespeare as there are professors of Shakespeare, future generations will have a difficult time at best of having a comprehensive grasp of their field. It seems to obtain now not just in the case of Shakespeare, but even of Eliot. But I didn't mean to say that just because an author has published a lot of books in a relatively short time that he or she doesn't have a lot to say. It raises the question, but doesn't necessarily imply the answer. Hence my query.
> 
> Thanks,
> Ken A
> 
> PS I believe Marshall McLuhan has now authored more books post mortem than when he was alive. So there is life after death....
> 
> 
> On 10/28/2013 11:21 AM, Carrol Cox wrote:
> 
> One of my professors at Michigan, Art Eastman, once suggested that no professor should be allowed to publish a book before he/she was 40. Probably "until 50 would" be even better. The number of books which might have made a good essay constitutes about 95% or more of the books published by university faculty.
>