Print

Print


CR's posts are always well enough identified. When no one wants to talk about Eliot, he provides an alternative. It keeps the ball rolling, so to speak.
P.

"[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>I disagree.  Although this list has a stated goal it is after all a form of verbal communication and one must allow conversations to wander and the edges of discussions to become frayed.  One might possibly also argue that Eliot's influence is so pervasive that it affects all thoughts whether published or unpublished about poetry or similar attempts at heightened language.
>
>
>Eugene Schlanger
>
>
>On Aug 12, 2013, at 8:42 AM, Tom Colket <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
><!-- .hmmessage P { margin:0px; padding:0px } body.hmmessage { font-size: 12pt; font-family:Calibri } --> 
>
>You must be a new subscriber to this list.  Your post that this has nothing whatsoever to do with T. S. Eliot, which is the topic that the List subscribers have voluntarily chosen to discuss. 
>
>There are many Internet lists that talk about poetry in general, but this is not one of them. 
>
>For the occasional post that is off-topic, we put the phase "off-topic" in the subject line as a courtesy  to alert subscribers that a given post does not pertain to T. S. Eliot (although the Listers may still find the post interesting). 
>
>Unfortunately, your post was both off-topic and contains no such labeling.
>
>Failure to adhere to these simple rules is considered rude and arrogant. While the list has no moderator (so every post is sent automatically to all subscribers without a person screening the posts) we are self-policing. This means that we do respond to inappropriate posts in an attempt to maintain the purpose, integrity, and quality of the list. 
>
>When we have not done a good job of self-policing in the past, we have seen List membership drop neatly in half from its high point in 2001. We are currently trying to re-build the List membership. Please help us by following our conventions.
>
>-- Tom Colket --
>
>Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 04:55:05 -0700
>From: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Fw: Poem-A-Day: Conspiracy to Commit Larceny: A Recipe by Jennifer Militello
>To: [log in to unmask]
>
>The poet will forgive me but with due respect I must say this is fine but it is not poetry.
>Being subjective? 
>Any opinion?
>CR
>
>
>
>From: Poets.org <[log in to unmask]>; 
>To: <[log in to unmask]>; 
>Subject: Poem-A-Day: Conspiracy to Commit Larceny: A Recipe by Jennifer Militello 
>Sent: Mon, Aug 12, 2013 10:38:59 AM 
>
>
>
>
> 
>
> 
>
>Conspiracy to Commit Larceny: A Recipe  
>
>by Jennifer Militello
>
> 
>
> 
>
>Take the man you think you love and his 
>
>fabulous lips. Take him from one place 
>
>to the next. Let him drive your car. Let him 
>
>drive it through the mood-crazed woods 
>
>until it overheats. Let the nights feed 
>
>from your eyes as you look at him. Do 
>
>not turn on the heat. Do not spill 
>
>the flavored oils of the heart. Do not 
>
>eat from the palm of your hand 
>
>a fluid ounce of what you may need. 
>
>Do something illegal. You only have to be 
>
>there when they bring the contraband in. 
>
>You only have to leave yourself behind. 
>
>The stars know. The police will prowl 
>
>your neighborhood until the plate number 
>
>matches and the car checks out. 
>
>When they bring you in, you 
>
>must remove your shoes and belt. 
>
>You must pretend there was no felony. 
>
>Then you must confess. Add your past, 
>
>a pinch of the rage you feel, and how 
>
>you sit until your father bursts in 
>
>and asks whether you have been arrested. 
>
>Add a mother who tells you she is 
>
>ashamed. An expensive lawyer. The way 
>
>you remember the taste of his kiss and 
>
>how real he was and how he would 
>
>drive dark roads at high speeds through 
>