And they are that with which we create the future. Point well taken pm

Tom Colket <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

P> Art is prophetic; it can even create the future.

The Modernists had an even more startling theory: the present changes the past. 

For example, consider this passage from Eliot's "Tradition and the Individual Talent"

". . . the difference between the present and the past is that the conscious present is an awareness of the past in a way and to an extent which the past's awareness of itself cannot show.

Some one said: 'The dead writers are remote from us because we know so much more than they did.' Precisely, and they are that which we know.

-- Tom --


> Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2012 01:45:45 -0700
> From: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Meeting the stranger
> To: [log in to unmask]
> The future is always strange; science is always about the past. Art is prophetic; it can even create the future. One can't get anything more out of date than the big bang. Fiat lux!!!