Also, may we not use the term 'objective correlative' with regard to Eliot's poetry
without being bound by Eliot's specific notion of it?
IMHO, we may.
From: Chokh Raj <[log in to unmask]>;
To: <[log in to unmask]>;
Subject: Re: OT - Chapel Perilous
Sent: Wed, May 2, 2012 7:02:48 PM
An interesting remark, Peter. It prompts me to raise a query.In deciphering Eliot's poetry, are we bound by Eliot's notion of 'objective correlative'?IMHO, a reader is free to view Eliot's poetry in the light of what we generally mean byobjective correlative rather than be guided solely by Eliot's criterion of it.Regards,CR
From: Peter Montgomery <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: Wednesday, May 2, 2012 2:45 AM
Subject: Re: OT - Chapel PerilousSounds to me like we're creeping closer and closer to the objective correlative.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Rickard Parker" <[log in to unmask]>
> Why, for all of us, out of all that we have heard, seen, felt, in a
> lifetime, do certain images recur, charged with emotion, rather than others?
> The song of one bird, the leap of one fish, at a particular place and time,
> the scent of one flower, an old woman on a German mountain path, six
> ruffians seen through an open window playing cards at night at a small
> French railway junction where there was a water-mill: such memories may have
> symbolic value, but of what we cannot tell, for they come to represent the
> depths of feeling into which we cannot peer. We might just as well ask why,
> when we try to recall visually some period in the past, we find in our
> memory just the few meagre arbitrarily chosen set of snapshots that we do
> find there, the faded poor souvenirs of passionate moments.