Eliot produced a lot of poor stuff also; he didn't publish it. But you
can read it now in IMH. (Actually, some of that is good also, but it's
sometimes crude or even offensive). It is interesting to note just how
little Eliot did publish for someone with his ability and fame. 

>>> David Boyd 11/07/11 4:00 AM >>>
Just recalling when I was fortunate enough, in Summer 2010, to be able
to attend a talk by Prof Brooker, where she compared Wordsworth's themes
etc with Eliot

And, I have to agree with the view of a (more minor) poetic contemporary
of Eliot, that Wordsworth produced some of the finest poetry in the
English language, but a lot of pretty poor stuff too - far more
profligate / garrulous than Eliot !

On 7 November 2011 02:57, Chokh Raj <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
A Review of 

T. S. Eliot: The Contemporary Reviews
Jewel Spears Brooker, ed.
Cambridge University Press, 2004 

By Bernard Brugière 

"Another recurrent debate concerns the hiatus between the early (up to
Ash-Wedneday) and the later poetry presumably underlain by the
transformation of the author of "Prufrock", "The Hippopotamus" and The
Waste Land into a renegade, whose diasavowal of agnosticism was
comparable with Wordsworth’s abandonment of his youthful revolutionary
principles. Yet the more perceptive reviewers sensed that Eliot’s
conversion to Christianity entailed no dramatic reversal of his earlier
beliefs and noted that "the surface discontinuity concealed a deeper
continuity" (XXVI)." 

a nodding acquaintance -- just in case