insightful Julius encounter here ?

On 13 October 2011 20:51, David Boyd <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
Much here
- antisemitism is I think an example of perpetuated social and social-psychological prejudice going back well over 1000 years in European history.
The psychological roots of prejudicial attitudes are well-known (eg 'the child is father to the man'), but often overlooked by those zealots  who seek to writhe Eliot out of his social-psychological context, and pillory the guy totally unrealistically for not observing 21st century codas of political correctness 
Pat was a breath of fresh air in that she was astute enough to recognize this and, despite her own Jewishness, not necessarily to take umbrage about it, a la Mr Julius et al
She once observed to me, about living in NYC, that 'if you look and behave  like a potential victim, you'll become one'
Pat was far above simply playing the antisemirism card herself, and a very great example of 'we are where we are' philosophy.
RIP, Pat (though sure she'll be giving St Peter and friends utter hell)

On 13 October 2011 19:55, Chokh Raj <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
Certainly, Rick. They all meld into one.
But all this is too obvious, for all to see, and censure.
What, however, interests me is the etiology of Eliot's anti-semitism.
Some of it is obvious in the long history of social prejudice.
However, there seem to be larger, and not so obvious, contexts that lie
behind Eliot's anti-Semitic stance. On one occasion a critic I posted the
link to at the list provided much insight on this.  I can't find it now.
Well, I'd like to keep informed on this. I await Patricia Sloane to
arrive any day. And I look forward to reading her.

From: Rickard A. Parker <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2011 1:32 PM

Subject: Re: The Jew in Eliot's poetry (was Re: Eliot and literary culture)

On 10/13/2011 11:15 AM, Chokh Raj wrote:
> Consider this too, if you like.
> 1. Mr Eugenides, the Smyrna merchant;
> 2. Bleistein (Chicago Semite Viennese);
> 3. "the jew", "Spawned in some estaminet of Antwerp, /
> Blistered in Brussels, patched and peeled in London".
> All three could be variations on essentially the same character.

Why? Because all three are associated with cities?
If so then Mr. Silvero at Limoges COULD be a Jewish landlord.

    Rick Parker