Not all the men came back. Many came back dysfunctional. I believe one of the women's husbands had just got demobbed. A lot of them didn't, for after WWI most of the countries maintained standing armies.
----- Original Message -----
From: [log in to unmask] href="mailto:[log in to unmask]">Nancy Gish
To: [log in to unmask] href="mailto:[log in to unmask]">[log in to unmask]
Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2011 6:39 PM
Subject: Re: 'The Waste Land' - a recitation (was Re: vis-a-vis 'Four Quartets')

During the War, yes.  Not much after. But working in a pub is something women would likely have been able to sustain.

>>> Peter Montgomery <[log in to unmask]> 09/15/11 9:24 PM >>>
I suppose, during and after the "great war" it would be quite commonplace
for women to be doing
just about all the jobs around.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Carrol Cox" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, September 09, 2011 3:36 PM
Subject: Re: 'The Waste Land' - a recitation (was Re: vis-a-vis 'Four

> On 9/9/2011 4:22 PM, David Boyd wrote:
>> Have always seen the 'hurry up......' exhortations as 'voices off'' and
>> so
>> commonplace to an English pub session as not to be too relevant at all
>> as
>> to the gender or whatever of the person in charge of the bar - surely
>> this
>> matters not a jot ?
>> Of course there is irony and ambiguity in this context in the words it's
>> time', but 'Time Gentlemen Please !' and 'Can we please have yer glasses'
>> are / were very very commonplace cries at the (enforced) hour of closing
>> of
>> UK bars and pubs, and Eliot's portrayal just at one level provides
>> authenticity for the whole working class pub session scenario.
> Any non-frivolous discussion of the lines _begins_ with taking David's
> point for granted. That's where interpretation begins, fitting the
> bartender's words first into the conversation it interrupts, then into the
> framework of that section of the poem, and (skipping a couple steps) into
> the obsession with time that characterizes Eliot's poetic work. Trying to
> take the words away from the bartender, or fussing about the speaker's
> gender seems like a deliberate attempt to disrupt discussion. And when
> such disruptions begin to characterize almost all list conversation, you
> have the death of the list as a serious response to Eliot or even as
> light entertainmenbt for those interested in the poems rather than the
> sound of their own voices in an echo chamber.
> Carrol