Well, one might, but that is not how Eliot defines it.
N
>>> Chokh Raj <
[log in to unmask]> 05/04/10 9:39 AM
>>>
One might say this of the "telescoping of images and
multiplied associations", I suppose.
Thanks,
CR
--- On
Tue, 5/4/10, Peter Montgomery <
[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Er... the objective
> correlative?
> P.
> > > >>> Chokh Raj 05/03/10 11:54 AM
>
>>>
>
> > > Apropos the Metaphysical poets, of
their poetic
> virtues,
> Eliot takes
> > > note
of, in particular, a certain
> "telescoping of images and
> >
> multiplied associations", and
> a "heterogeneity of material
> compelled
> > > into
> unity by the operation of
the poet's
> mind" -- a "put[ting]
> the
> > >
material together again in a new unity".
> >
> >
>
> > In fine,
> > >
> > > "When
> a
poet's mind is perfectly equipped for its
> work, it is
> >
>
> constantly amalgamating disparate
> experience; the
ordinary
> man's
> > > experience is chaotic, irregular,
fragmentary.
> The
> latter falls in
> > > love, or
reads Spinoza, and these two
> experiences have nothing to do
>
> > with each other, or with
> the noise of the typewriter or the
smell of
> > > cooking;
> in the mind of the poet these
experiences
> are always forming
>
> > > new
wholes. " -- T.S. Eliot,
> 'The Metaphysical
> Poets'
>
> http://personal.centenary.edu/~dhavird/TSEMetaPoets.html
>
> > refreshing the memory --
>
> > > CR