Print

Print


> Nancy Gish wrote:
> 
> I responded to Jerome's account of grammar itself, not that in the
> poem.  It is clear that this "he" is Christ; but that is a different
> issue from the definition of gendered pronouns as a general
> grammatical claim.

That was quite clearly your point, and you should not have to defend
yourself on it.

it is hard to hold a conversation on this list.

Carrol