Print

Print


Which ones? I haven't seen any.
Peter
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Diana Manister 
  To: [log in to unmask] 
  Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 6:41 AM
  Subject: Re: Prufrock question turned obnoxious


  Dear Peter,
   
  I'm assuming you're including Ken's sarcastic remarks to Nancy in your characterization. Or does he get a pass?
   
  Diana
   

  > I suppose anytime the style of the insistence is uncivil.
  > P.
  > ----- Original Message ----- 
  > From: "DIana Manister" <[log in to unmask]>
  > To: <[log in to unmask]>
  > Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 6:54 AM
  > Subject: Re: Prufrock question turned obnoxious
  > 
  > 
  > > Marcia,
  > > 
  > > Since when is insistence on good scholarship impolite?
  > > 
  > > Diana
  > > 
  > > Sent from my iPod
  > > 
  > > On Feb 3, 2010, at 9:49 AM, Marcia Karp <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
  > > 
  > > > I'm sorry Ken that you aren't being accorded the basic respect any 
  > > > polite person would accord you.
  > > >
  > > > The list has survived the particular noxious combination of 
  > > > ignorance, arrogance, and toadyism before. Perhaps it will again.
  > > >
  > > > Best,
  > > > Marcia
  > > >
  > > > DIana Manister wrote:
  > > >> Dear Ken,
  > > >>
  > > >> We can say Prufrock is an aardvark too, according to your laissez- 
  > > >> faire approach. But why not apply those wild imaginings to a poem 
  > > >> of your own, if Eliot's text is being ignored?
  > > >>
  > > >



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft’s powerful SPAM protection. Sign up now.