Print

Print


Dear Peter,

 

I'm assuming you're including Ken's sarcastic remarks to Nancy in your characterization. Or does he get a pass?

 

Diana
 


> I suppose anytime the style of the insistence is uncivil.
> P.
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "DIana Manister" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 6:54 AM
> Subject: Re: Prufrock question turned obnoxious
> 
> 
> > Marcia,
> > 
> > Since when is insistence on good scholarship impolite?
> > 
> > Diana
> > 
> > Sent from my iPod
> > 
> > On Feb 3, 2010, at 9:49 AM, Marcia Karp <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> > 
> > > I'm sorry Ken that you aren't being accorded the basic respect any 
> > > polite person would accord you.
> > >
> > > The list has survived the particular noxious combination of 
> > > ignorance, arrogance, and toadyism before. Perhaps it will again.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Marcia
> > >
> > > DIana Manister wrote:
> > >> Dear Ken,
> > >>
> > >> We can say Prufrock is an aardvark too, according to your laissez- 
> > >> faire approach. But why not apply those wild imaginings to a poem 
> > >> of your own, if Eliot's text is being ignored?
> > >>
> > >

 		 	   		  
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft’s powerful SPAM protection.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/201469226/direct/01/