Print

Print


Perhaps your use of the word "opponent"  signals your attitude, not  
mine.

Diana

Sent from my iPod

On Feb 1, 2010, at 3:50 AM, Peter Montgomery <[log in to unmask]>  
wrote:

> Perhaps not reading an opponent's point is a way of expressing a  
> reply.
> :}{
> P
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Carrol Cox" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Friday, January 29, 2010 11:19 AM
> Subject: Re: Prufrock question
>
>
>> It may be that my poor vision prevents me from following some complex
>> asrguments here, but in so far as I have made any sense of the  
>> argument
>> between Ken & Diana, it goes roughly like this:
>>
>> John Doe: A
>>
>> Richard Roe: Not A, A
>>
>> John Doe:  A not B
>>
>> Richard Roe: I said A not B not
>>
>> And sor forth.
>>
>> Are either of you reading either each other or anyone else's posts?
>>
>> Carrol
>