Dear Ken,
I must say you are the only one I've encountered who doesn't see the radical nature of Derrida's philosophy of différance; using the French word has a purpose: it has more meanings than the English word difference, one of being deferral.
The adjectives "ponderous" and "fashionable" offer nothing in the way of critique; Aristotle was ponderous and fashionable in his time. You might just say you don't like Continental philosophy and be honest about it.
Postmodern philosophy is anything but German idealism; it's post-Kantian, deriving from Heidegger's phenomenology, which is different from Husserl's dualism.
> Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 22:08:18 -0500
> From: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Eliot's poetry: the medium & the message
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Diana Manister wrote:
> > Ken, if I say "red is a color but so is pink" am I establishing a
> > binary relationship or describing difference?
> Uh huh, I get it. But if you say, "I'm sorry but I simply see
> difference where you see opposition," you are, in your terms,
> "establishing a binary relationship." Get it?
> >
> > I find that many people think of differences as oppositions, as if
> > they can't think beyond duality
> To be honest, you're the only person I know who doesn't see that
> some differences aren't oppositional and some are. One can reasonably
> dispense with neither, ponderous German idealists and fashionable French
> deconstructionists notwithstanding.
> Ken

Your E-mail and More On-the-Go. Get Windows Live Hotmail Free. Sign up now.