Print

Print


If not, I have the '48 edition with the original note. 
Nancy

>>> Ken Armstrong 01/17/10 9:09 PM >>> 
Tom Colket wrote: 
> Great job, CR, of finding the original footnote. It is worded _quite_ 
> differently from the 1962 re-write! 
It is worded somewhat differently, but my first impression was as 
Raine described: there is no discontinuity between the two. 
> 
> Just in case the link ever goes away, I think it's worth making these 
> part of the TSE archives: 
Are there archives? 

Thanks, 
Ken A