[log in to unmask]" type="cite"> Dear Marcia,
Do you not see that a plan for hunger removal is a plan to get food?
What's your problem there?
Diana
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 10:58:56 -0500
From: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Residual agency
To: [log in to unmask]
No, actually it was hunger removal.
Diana Manister wrote:[log in to unmask]"> Dear Marcia,
Your agenda this morning was not hunger. It was a plan to get food.
Diana
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 09:52:20 -0500
From: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Residual agency
To: [log in to unmask]
By this logic
Don't you think a theory is a de facto agenda?agenda means nothing. My agenda for this morning's breakfast was hunger, though yesterday it was taste.
Don't you think the agenda of a theory then is to be "a predictive expression of an observed pattern?"
(in response to Rick below)
What did you have in mind by your first question (above)?
Best,
Marcia
Diana Manister wrote:[log in to unmask]"> Dear Rick:
Don't you think the agenda of a theory then is to be "a predictive expression of an observed pattern?"
Does every agenda have to be political?
Diana
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2010 11:23:41 -0700
From: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Residual agency
To: [log in to unmask]
Dear list
Diane wrote: Don't you think a theory is a de facto agenda?
Traditionally a theory is simply a predictive expression of an observed pattern. I think theories can become agendas when their observed pattern has been conditioned by faith and/or ideology.
To the extent that literary theories are conditioned by faith and/or ideology they then are agendas.
Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection. Sign up now.
Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft. Get it now.