Well, if one reads any of the biographies, it is hard to think he never was. But that aside, his position was that of many famous people who did show appreciation without this evasion.
Nancy>>> Chokh Raj <[log in to unmask]>06/17/09 7:27 AM >>>
More often than not, for a person placed in Eliot's position, one has to be wary of making
comments because they are liable to misuse. I do not suppose Eliot would be so unkind as not appreciate where appreciation was due in his estimation.
If your purpose is to acknowledge and appreciate another's thoughtfulness, clearly it is not. If your purpose is to avoid that, it could be..
>>> Chokh Raj 06/17/09 6:19 AM >>>
I wonder if sending a thank-you note is being "covertly unkind".
If their gift required any kind of response at all,
was it really a gift?
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 2:30 PM
Subject: Re: Eliot on Gifts (Was Re: Augustine--Now ON Topic)
I've read it too and also don't remember where. But do you really consider it wisdom? It seems to me a way to be covertly unkind to those who sent a gift.
>>> Rickard Parker <[log in to unmask]
" target=_blank rel=nofollow>MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from "us.mc450.mail.yahoo.com" claiming to be MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from "us.mc450.mail.yahoo.com" claiming to be [log in to unmask]
> 06/16/09 5:18 PM >>>
> The OT thread on the phrase and concept "free gift" made me want to look
> at how Eliot deals with "gifts" and "giving" in his poetry.
On the subject of gifts here is something that I first send after
Now seems a good time to pass along a little bit of Eliot wisdom.
Eliot said to write a thank you note immediately for every book gotten
as a gift. That way one avoided having to comment upon its content.
I wish I remembered where I read this.