>>> Peter Montgomery <[log in to unmask]>06/17/09 2:54 AM >>>

If their gift required any kind of response at all,
was it really a gift?
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
----- Original Message ----- 
From: <A [log in to unmask] href="mailto:[log in to unmask]">Nancy Gish 
To: <A [log in to unmask] href="mailto:[log in to unmask]">[log in to unmask] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 2:30 PM
Subject: Re: Eliot on Gifts (Was Re: Augustine--Now ON Topic)

Dear Rickard,
I've read it too and also don't remember where.  But do you really consider it wisdom?  It seems to me a way to be covertly unkind to those who sent a gift.  

>>> Rickard Parker <[log in to unmask]> 06/16/09 5:18 PM >>> 
> The OT thread on the phrase and concept "free gift" made me want to look 
> at how Eliot deals with "gifts" and "giving" in his poetry. 

On the subject of gifts here is something that I first send after 
Christmas 2007: 

Now seems a good time to pass along a little bit of Eliot wisdom. 

Eliot said to write a thank you note immediately for every book gotten 
as a gift. That way one avoided having to comment upon its content. 

I wish I remembered where I read this. 

Rick Parker