Print

Print


If copyrighting the equation had a defacto effect of copyrighting the
natural process, then I wouldn't see the equation as copyrightable,
for the equation IS the natural process in another form.

P.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Richard Seddon" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2008 9:18 AM
Subject: Re: [Fwd: [A-List] Law professor fires back at song-swapping
lawsuits]


> Tom
>
> Questions not meant as a challenge but rather plain curiosity.
>
> If I write a hitherto unknown equation which reveals new information
> contained within a natural process, is that equation protected under
> Canadian law.  I have not created information: I have revealed a pathway
to
> observing that information.  My later written description of that equation
> is obviously protected under any copyright but that written description
> reveals information about the equation and how that equation reveals
> information about natural processes and does not reveal primary
information.
>
> The basic question is when is information created and when is it displayed
> and is the one act as deserving of copyright as the other.
>
> I gather together a series of ancient poems, and change their format
> slightly.  The change in format (i.e., instead of one space between the
> title and the body, two spaces)  is obviously intended to create
copyrights.
> I now publish them under my own copyright.  How have I created information
> that deserves copyright?
>
> www.pagebypagebooks.com is an example of the above.  Obviously they have
> created a pathway to information but have they created information?
>
> BTW; www.bartleby.com contains the full text of "The Waste Land".
>
> Rick Seddon
> Portales, NM
>
>
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG.
> Version: 7.5.552 / Virus Database: 270.9.11/1818 - Release Date:
11/28/2008 7:31 PM
>
>