Print

Print


So be it.
P.
----- Original Message -----
From: [log in to unmask] href="mailto:[log in to unmask]">Diana Manister
To: [log in to unmask] href="mailto:[log in to unmask]">[log in to unmask]
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2007 5:17 AM
Subject: Re: Water in TWL -- Heraclitus

Peter you dismiss my observation about the measure of credulity given to Sosostris as if it were mine alone, when several generally respected commentators have made the point. Your contempt then must extend to them. Diana


From:  Peter Montgomery <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To:  "T. S. Eliot Discussion forum." <[log in to unmask]>
To:  [log in to unmask]
Subject:  Re: Water in TWL -- Heraclitus
Date:  Mon, 30 Jul 2007 17:13:01 -0800
Ken, you're much more opolite than I am. ;->t;
Cheers,
P.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ken Armstrong" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2007 11:20 AM
Subject: Re: Water in TWL -- Heraclitus


> At 10:09 AM 7/30/2007, Diana Manister wrote:
>
> >Peter, while Eliot is not above simplistic satire, as evidenced by the
> >excised Fresca section, his treatment of Madam Sosostris is more
> >ambiguous. If her prediction about death by water comes true,
>
>    The irony is that it has already happened. She not only can not predict
> the future,  but doesn't do well with the past. TSE's treatment of Madame
S
> is not all that ambiguous.
>
> Ken A.
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Dataabase: 269.10.22/923 - Release Date: 7/27/2007
6:01 PM
>
>


More photos, more messages, more storageóget 2GB with Windows Live Hotmail.


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.11.2/931 - Release Date: 8/1/2007 4:53 PM