The paper linked below presents an  interesting discussion of King 
Lear's transformative journey relative  to T.S. Eliot's from the Eliot of TWL to 
the Eliot of the 4Q. I think it's worth  a print-out and a read. I like the 
optimistic perspective.
_Spies of  God: King Lear and the Christian Mystics_ 
(  <<Click here
OR copy and paste web address below:

In a message dated 8/1/2007 7:59:00 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
[log in to unmask] writes:

I don't  doubt that this passage shows Lear recovering his love for
Cordelia and  realizing what he had done.  That is not a mystical
experience in the  sense of St. John of the Cross or Julian or others. 
There are very  specific actions and experiences that are involved in the
"Dark  Night."  Certainly Lear goes through a period of great terror
and--in  his case--madness and recovers through love in some way.  But
the  parallels are not the same as what a mystic reports.

I have not reread  Lear recently, but it does not seem to be at all about
mystical experience  to me.
I would also be surprised if Shakespear's use of gods and God were  that
specific or limited to Lear.  Again, I would have to reread a  great deal
to be sure about  that.

>>> Barnwell  Black  <[log in to unmask]> 08/01/07 7:17 PM >>>

I  think there is an indication that King  Lear does indeed achieve some  
degree of spiritual rebirth after the death of the  Self, as per TSE  in
post-conversion poetry. 


************************************** Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL at