Print

Print


Good one! D.

And how do you prove ELiot was worth his salt, esp. when he needed
Pound to do the excisions?
 
'Twas a tale told by an eliot,
Full of Pound and theory.
 
P.
----- Original Message -----
From: [log in to unmask] href="mailto:[log in to unmask]">Diana Manister
To: [log in to unmask] href="mailto:[log in to unmask]">[log in to unmask]
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2007 6:36 AM
Subject: Re: Water in TWL--why?

Peter and Carrol, any poet worth his salt would excise meaningless sections of his or her text, not excepting Charles Bernstein. We may not understand the meanings, but that does not mean they are gibberish. Diana


From:  Peter Montgomery <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To:  "T. S. Eliot Discussion forum." <[log in to unmask]>
To:  [log in to unmask]
Subject:  Re: Water in TWL--why?
Date:  Fri, 3 Aug 2007 00:28:42 -0800
From: "Carrol Cox" <[log in to unmask]>
>
>> To see _everything_ as meaningful is to destroy all intelligible
> meaning.

The very aim and goal of the so-called movement, post modernism.

P.


More photos, more messages, more storageóget 2GB with Windows Live Hotmail.


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.11.4/935 - Release Date: 8/3/2007 5:46 PM



Tease your brain--play Clink! Win cool prizes!