Print

Print


FW: Potter Has Limited Effect on Reading Habits


-----Original Message-----
From: Monty Solomon [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Wed 7/11/2007 9:28 PM
To: undisclosed-recipient
Subject: Potter Has Limited Effect on Reading Habits


Potter Has Limited Effect on Reading Habits

By MOTOKO RICH
The New York Times
July 11, 2007

Of all the magical powers wielded by Harry Potter, perhaps none has
cast a stronger spell than his supposed ability to transform the
reading habits of young people. In what has become near mythology
about the wildly popular series by J. K. Rowling, many parents,
teachers, librarians and booksellers have credited it with inspiring
a generation of kids to read for pleasure in a world dominated by
instant messaging and music downloads.

And so it has, for many children. But in keeping with the intricately
plotted novels themselves, the truth about Harry Potter and reading
is not quite so straightforward a success story. Indeed, as the
series draws to a much-lamented close, federal statistics show that
the percentage of youngsters who read for fun continues to drop
significantly as children get older, at almost exactly the same rate
as before Harry Potter came along.

There is no doubt that the books have been a publishing sensation. In
the 10 years since the first one, "Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's
Stone," was published, the series has sold 325 million copies
worldwide, with 121.5 million in print in the United States alone.
Before Harry Potter, it was virtually unheard of for kids to queue up
for a mere book. Children who had previously read short chapter books
were suddenly plowing through more than 700 pages in a matter of
days. Scholastic, the series's United States publisher, plans a
record-setting print run of 12 million copies for "Harry Potter and
the Deathly Hallows," the eagerly awaited seventh and final
installment due out at 12:01 a.m. on July 21.

But some researchers and educators say that the series, in the end,
has not permanently tempted children to put down their Game Boys and
curl up with a book instead. Some kids have found themselves daunted
by the growing size of the books ("Sorcerer's Stone" was 309 pages;
"Deathly Hallows," will be 784). Others say that Harry Potter does
not have as much resonance as titles that more realistically reflect
their daily lives. "The Harry Potter craze was a very positive thing
for kids," said Dana Gioia, chairman of the National Endowment for
the Arts, who has reviewed statistics from federal and private
sources that consistently show that children read less as they age.
"It got millions of kids to read a long and reasonably complex series
of books. The trouble is that one Harry Potter novel every few years
is not enough to reverse the decline in reading."

Educators agree that the series can't get the job done alone.

...

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/11/books/11potter.html?ex=1341806400&en=b75927fcab608871&ei=5090