As to the narrator of TWL, I am remided of ELiot's statement in T&TIT:
  "The point of view which I am struggling to attack is perhaps related to the metaphysical theory of the substantial unity of the soul: for my meaning is, that the poet has, not a 'personality' to express, but a particular medium, which is only a medium and not a personality, in which impressions and experiences combine in peculiar and unexpected ways."

SO the psyche or whatever one wants to call it, that narrates the poem is more
like a set of interpenetrating psyches, somewhat ala Virginia Woolf. The note
on Tiresias would seem to support that.

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Chokh Raj 
  To: [log in to unmask] 
  Sent: Monday, July 23, 2007 11:19 AM
  Subject: Re: Rewrite The Waste Land

  Diana Manister <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
    Speech fragments cohere in TWL around a narrator. They are
    overheard or remembered by him, and I think become parts of
    the narrator's inner monologue, along with his own thoughts.
    In the later chapters of Joyce's Ulysses, on the other hand, 
    each speech fragment exists on its own without a central point 
    of view, either author or narrator or other normalizing character
    in the book to order them. Joyce's book becomes truly polyphonic, 
    where TWL is an inner monologue throughout.
  An excellent perception, Diana.  It helps resolve the fragments 
  into a unity in terms of their deliberate choice and arrangement
  by the poet -- with a  narrator to hold them together in a desired
  pattern of meaning.  And to cap it, you have elucidated your point 
  with a fine comparison with Joyce.  My compliments !!!


  Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone who knows.
  Yahoo! Answers - Check it out. 

  Shape Yahoo! in your own image. Join our Network Research Panel today! 


  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
  Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.14/912 - Release Date: 7/22/2007 7:02 PM