From: "Nancy Gish" <[log in to unmask]> > First, you have reverted to ad feminem remarks instead of any debate. I > think that destroys any possible useful discussion. > given to what you call "cant." > > I thought this list tried to stop being snide and actually have > discussions. =============================================== You must be overlooking the ad personam attacks on Eliot, which, not connected to any of his work, amounted simply to a crude attempt at character assassination. Gender as popularly used now is primarily a euphemism for the word sex. P.