Print

Print


From: "Nancy Gish" <[log in to unmask]>

> First, you have reverted to ad feminem remarks instead of any debate.  I
> think that destroys any possible useful discussion.
> given to what you call "cant."
> 
> I thought this list tried to stop being snide and actually have
> discussions.  
===============================================
You must be overlooking the ad personam attacks on Eliot,
which, not connected to any of his work, amounted simply to 
a crude attempt at character assassination.

Gender as popularly used now is primarily a euphemism for
the word sex.

P.