Print

Print


Just wanted to thank you all for your input, I have quite a bit to research now, will get back with you all when I get it all together and do something with it.
thanks
Steve

 
On 7/4/07, Peter Montgomery <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
Goodness gracious. A non-Salem witch, non Puritan point of view.
Thanks,
Peter
----- Original Message -----
From: "Carrol Cox" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2007 8:37 AM
Subject: Re: Prufrock and prostitution


> Nancy Gish wrote:
> >
> > If you mean secondary sources, I'm not sure at the moment, but there are
> > two sources at least in Eliot to look at.  The section of Prufrock that
> > Eliot never published, "Prufrock's Pervigilium," (it's in INVENTIONS OF
> > THE MARCH HARE) is much more explicit about the narrator being in a red
> > light district:
> >
> > And when the evening woke and stared into its blindness
> > I heard the children whimpering in corners
> > Where women took the air, standing in entries--
> > Women, spilling out of corsets, stood in entries
>
> (Bibliographical material from memory). Susie Bright, et al some years
> ago published a text entitled _Caught Looking_ which was a sort of
> combined history and feminist defense of pornography,* mostly in
> photographs. Someplace in it there is a photgraph, taken I presume in
> the 'old' Times Square neighborhood in NYC, of a woman standing in the
> entryway of a shop, the neon signs for which include one which
> proclaims "Live Sex."  That photograph should give a vivid illustration
> of one possible force of the last two of these quoted lines.
>
> Carrol
>
> *It was one of the texts in the "sex wars" that raged among feminists in
> the 1980s/90s.
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.9.14/885 - Release Date: 7/3/2007
10:02 AM
>
>