Thanks, Rick Parker, for sharing with us this rich information from your very resourceful website "Exploring TWL". To me, the knowledge of external facts, of all the mundane details, enable us to probe the workings of a modernist, symbolist poet's "Unconscious", the substratum of his being where the images register themselves as necessary tools for the voice of his "Calling". Regards, CR "Rickard A. Parker" <[log in to unmask]> wrote: On my local version of "Exploring TWL" I have the following note for Stetson: Stetson There have been several suggestions to the significance of the name Stetson. Stetson was the name of a co-worker at the bank at which Eliot worked. However, Eliot's friends saw this as a reference to Eliot's American friend, Ezra Pound. The name may stand for "everyman"; a less common verson of Smith or Jones. In 1988 Donald J. Childs proposed a more elaborate and complete an explanation. To him Eliot used the name Stetson to represent a soldier of the Australia and New Zealand Army Corp (ANZAC) and, in turn, the ANZACs signified the failed Gallipoli campaign of World War I. This was where Eliot's friend Jean Verdenal was killed. The ANZAC soldiers wore Stetson hats. Childs' explanation of the use of Stetson connects him with parts of the poem in ways that the other explanations don't. Perhaps most obvious is the war connection between Gallipoli and the Punic War battle of Mylae mentioned on line 70. There would be plenty of corpses for Stetson to bury. There is also the connection with the brothel madame, Mrs. Porter (see the commentary attached to Eliot's note to line 199 ). Further, the rats that formed part of the life of the soldiers in the trenches appear here and there in The Waste Land. The parade of the workers across the bridge line 62 may have reminded Eliot of the parades of the ANZAC veterans that several times marched through London. In the same essay, Childs discussed the significance of the Smyrna merchant (see the Smyrna merchant commentary ). He also supplied information about the Gallipoli campaign's battle of Krithia that saw the French dead being disposed of in the sea. There may be some connection with Phlebas the Phoenician. Childs, Donald J., "Stetson in The Waste Land," Essays in Criticism, (April 1988) pp. 131-148 Regards, Rick Parker P.S. On the http://www.5rar.asn.au/hat.htm webpage (mentioned in an earlier post): In 1903, after federation, the slouch hat became the standard headdress in the reorganized Australian army and the hat appeared with the left side clipped up to enable the rifle to be carried at the slope without fouling the hat brim. In the U.S. armed forces the rifle (not the gun, that's for fun) is carried on the right shoulder when marching. On the other side of the world and equator that gets reversed (just as the sun sets in the east ;-) and the brim of the hat has to be turned up over on the left to keep the hat in place. The Aussie slouch hat is my usual head gear when hiking but I wear it with the brim down so my left ear doesn't get redder than my right one. --------------------------------- Food fight? Enjoy some healthy debate in the Yahoo! Answers Food & Drink Q&A.