It need not be either approval or disapproval but simply fact. It was Eliot, after all, who said that it was better to do evil than to do nothing because "at least we exist." (Or it may be "at least we are alive"--I just read it but it's not right here.) In any case, daring moments are not very present in any of the poetry, and when they are possible, whoever is speaking tends to fail. It was not much of a marriage for Viv either, and it was she whose life never recovered. He seems to have sustained guilt over that but not to have acted on his guilt. Nancy >>> cr mittal <[log in to unmask]> 06/10/07 1:12 PM >>> Diana Manister <[log in to unmask]> wrote: The awful daring of a moment's surrender Which an age of prudence can never retract CR: I have always seen this as Eliot's way of saying "Marry in haste, repent at leisure." Not believing in divorce, his sudden to decision to marry Viv left him one of their lifetimes in which to repent. Diana I don't think so, Diana. There's a note of approval, not disapproval, to the "awful daring of a moment's surrender" in The awful daring of a moment's surrender Which an age of prudence can never retract // By this, and this only, we have existed // Regards, CR --------------------------------- Get your own web address. Have a HUGE year through Yahoo! Small Business.