Print

Print


Stetson at Mylae=Punic Wars / Phlebas the Phoenician. / profit and loss
Those are pearls that were his eyes.
P.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Carrol Cox" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 8:07 PM
Subject: Re: "Overall context" was The Yoruba and TSE


> Richard Seddon wrote:
> >
> > Carrol
> >
> > I do not agree that Pound was the "primary writer" or that he extracted
a
> > poem from a "mass of material".  At most Pound was an advisor and
perhaps in
> > a rudimentary way an editor.  He had filled this role many times with
others
> > of the modernists as he recruited their work for American poetry
magazines.
> >
>
> I don't really disagree -- I did say "argument _could be_ made." It's
> just that unity can never be taken for granted but needs to be
> established by showing that the unity claimed actually illuminates the
> parts -- and that argument has to ascribe some independence to the parts
> or there is nothing to unify. Specifically, unless the Stetson passage
> has _some_ independent status, it can contribute nothing to the whole
> nor can the whole illuminate it.
>
> For example. In PL, all our knowledge of Adam's creation comes from Adam
> himself! The narrator gives us no direct account whatever. So while we
> know that that creation is prologue as it were first to fall and then to
> recovery, we would empty the scene of any real interest if we were to
> say it is an instance of fall and recovery.  We can't know how it fits
> into (if it does) a dynamic of fall and recovery and until we first see
> it as an action of a certain kind in its own  right. Similarly, we
> banalize the Stetson episode if we simply label it another instance of
> the presumed general theme of TWL.
>
> Carrol
>
>
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.8.7/829 - Release Date: 6/2/2007
5:26 PM
>
>