Print

Print


Yes. Them poem lacks tension and intensity.
I'm sure he enjoyed those lacks.
 
Cheers,
Peter
----- Original Message -----
From: [log in to unmask] href="mailto:[log in to unmask]">David Boyd
To: [log in to unmask] href="mailto:[log in to unmask]">[log in to unmask]
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 2:19 PM
Subject: Re: 4QReadings - Of Love

In a message dated 19/12/2006 21:51:13 GMT Standard Time, [log in to unmask] writes:
G.S. Fraser in his book, _Ezra Pound_ (Grove press, 1960), in responding
to one of Pound's poems (Ballad of the Goodly Frere) told an anecdote
from his childhood. He and his sister would regularly attend movies on
Saturdays, and when the movie turned out to be so bad that one was
embarassed for the actors, his sister would begin to chew the tips of
her gloves. Hence he and she coined the term "glove-sucky" for poems,
movies, so bad that they were embarassing. Eliot's poem to his wife is
indeed "glove-sucky"; it is embarassingly bad. Admirers of Eliot can
only pretend that it didn't happen.

Carrol
Methinks this illustrates that which I was attempting to say in the original post: something like that one has to have been there / done that in order completely to understand the concept / emotions. Just am glad that TSE reached that stage/state in his earthly existence !
 
Regards David
 


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.15.22/590 - Release Date: 12/16/2006 5:39 PM