Print

Print


As the Japanese say: "motai nai".
P.
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Diana Manister 
  To: [log in to unmask] 
  Sent: Sunday, September 03, 2006 7:50 AM
  Subject: Re: Conversations in Bloomsbury (Eliot and India)


  honi soit qui mal y pense!




----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    From: Peter Montgomery <[log in to unmask]>
    Reply-To: "T. S. Eliot Discussion forum." <[log in to unmask]>
    To: [log in to unmask]
    Subject: Re: Conversations in Bloomsbury (Eliot and India)
    Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 02:48:49 -0700


    I can find no epithets to apply to you, which please me no end.
    P.
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: Diana Manister 
      To: [log in to unmask] 
      Sent: Friday, September 01, 2006 2:31 PM
      Subject: Re: Conversations in Bloomsbury (Eliot and India)


      Peter, now you are being coy. That is better than glib. I believe I am improving you with my scolding, which is my intent!

      Diana

      Ah yes, but existence of what?

        P.
          Peter, your verb implies existence. Diana

          Peter wrote: It is rather simple that the ultimate particle suffers from non-existence.

          I accuse you of unnecessary, if entertaining, complexity.
          P.
          > Peter I accuse you of glibness. Heidegger and Sartre wrote volumes on
          > non-existence. Holderlin took it as his main theme. Hamlet struggled with
          it
          > for an entire play. Eliot in the Four Quartets contemplated non-existent
          > children that in some way tormented him. And on and on. If everyone agreed
          > with your assertion, literature for one would be less extant (that is,
          lost
          > somewhere in non-existence.) Best, Diana
          >
          >
          > From: Peter Montgomery <[log in to unmask]>
          > Reply-To: "T. S. Eliot Discussion forum." <[log in to unmask]>
          > To: [log in to unmask]
          > Subject: Re: Conversations in Bloomsbury (Eliot and India)
          > Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 14:51:23 -0700
          >
          > Non-existence is simple.
          > P.
          > ----- Original Message -----
          > From: "Diana Manister" <[log in to unmask]>
          > To: <[log in to unmask]>
          > Sent: Monday, August 28, 2006 8:31 AM
          > Subject: Re: Conversations in Bloomsbury (Eliot and India)
          >
          >
          >  > Peter, there is a bit of difference between simple and non-existent,
          no?
          >  > Diana
          >  >
          >  > The ultimte particle, of its nature, is simple.
          >  > P.
          >  > ----- Original Message -----
          >  > From: "Diana Manister" <[log in to unmask]>
          >  > To: <[log in to unmask]>
          >  > Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 12:18 PM
          >  > Subject: Re: Conversations in Bloomsbury (Eliot and India)
          >  >
          >  >
          >  >  > Peter, CR sent me an article by Deepak Chopra in which he says "the
          >  >  > essential nature of the material world is that it is not material."
          I
          >  > sense
          >  >  > that there is a connection with that and the statement that there is
          > no
          >  >  > ultimate particle. If your understanding lends itself to
          verbalization
          >  > and
          >  >  > you feel inclined to expand your intriguing two-word hint, I'm all
          > ears!
          >  > Or
          >  >  > was that the verbal equivalent of the guru's smile? Diana
          >  >  >
          >  >  > From: Peter Montgomery <[log in to unmask]>
          >  >  >
          >  >  > "There is no ultimate particle," he said with a  smile that
          >  >  > hinted at an understanding I'm still trying to get my mind around
          and
          >  >  > probably never will!
          >  >  > ===============
          >  >  > It's simple.
          >  >  > P.
          >  >  >
          >  >  >
          >  >  > --
          >  >  > No virus found in this incoming message.
          >  >  > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
          >  >  > Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.11.4/424 - Release Date:
          > 8/21/2006
          >  >  >
          >  >  >
          >  >
          >  >
          >  > --
          >  > Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
          >  > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
          >  > Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.11.4/424 - Release Date:
          8/21/2006
          >  >
          >  >
          >
          >
          > --
          > No virus found in this incoming message.
          > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
          > Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.11.6/430 - Release Date: 8/28/2006
          >
          >



----------------------------------------------------------------------


          No virus found in this incoming message.
          Checked by AVG Free Edition.
          Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.11.7/432 - Release Date: 8/29/2006





--------------------------------------------------------------------------


      No virus found in this incoming message.
      Checked by AVG Free Edition.
      Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.11.7/432 - Release Date: 8/29/2006





------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG Free Edition.
  Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.11.7/436 - Release Date: 9/1/2006