We agree.
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Diana Manister 
  To: [log in to unmask] 
  Sent: Monday, September 11, 2006 8:14 AM
  Subject: Re: causality

  The particle-wave example illuminates quantum physics' new phenomenology: the observed cannot be separated from the observer. Subjectivity in this case determines the object. The self/other split is Cartesian. 

  In Einsteinian physics, the phenomenon of time is subjective. At the speed of light, there is no time -- consciousness travelling at that rate would be timeless. In a timeless state, considerations of cause and effect do not obtain, since chronology is a function of time.  Diana


    From:  Dunja Seselja <[log in to unmask]>
    Reply-To:  "T. S. Eliot Discussion forum." <[log in to unmask]>
    To:  [log in to unmask]
    Subject:  causality
    Date:  Fri, 8 Sep 2006 16:08:48 -0700
    --- Peter Montgomery <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

    > E=MC(2)  refocussed the idea of causality
    > in terms of the building blocks out of which things
    > are made.
    > Matter as both particle and wave.
    > P.

    But why would this imply (or presuppose) a different
    sort of causality? There is a cause, there's an
    effect. I don't see any "final purpose" present in
    Einstein's theory...
    As for the particle/wave problem - how do you relate
    that to the problem of causality at all? Besides,
    contemporary interpretations of quantum physics still
    have a lot of trouble trying to connect this theory
    with relativist physics, so I don't understand what
    you meant when you said that sentence... :-/



    Do You Yahoo!?
    Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around


  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG Free Edition.
  Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.3/445 - Release Date: 9/11/2006