I guess what distinguishes 'Prufrock and Other Observations'
from 'Poems 1920' is that whereas in the first collection the
"speaker" is only a passive _observer_ and commentator of
his own self as well as of his social ambience, in the latter
collection he is a participant as well in the action of the
poems. But this has perhaps already been observed
by some critics.
~ CR

Diana Manister <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
"Observations" in the title might announce epistimology as a theme.  Diana

From:  Dunja Seselja <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To:  "T. S. Eliot Discussion forum." <[log in to unmask]>
To:  [log in to unmask]
Subject:  Re: Identity of the speaker in 'Preludes'
Date:  Tue, 12 Sep 2006 11:59:20 -0700
--- Peter Montgomery <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> I mean that it is indicator of how the poems can be
> read.
> P.

That's a good point. Observations imply that there is
an observer and "observables". Subject-object
problematics is, therefore, announced already in the
title of the volume.



Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around

Do you Yahoo!?
Get on board. You're invited to try the new Yahoo! Mail.