Print

Print


At 05:17 PM 9/22/2006, Diana Manister wrote:

>CR wrote: I'm sorry but your remark, "Eliot, though an imaginative genius, 
>had his own divisive vision. Alas." is rather off-the-cuff, Diana.There 
>should be no confusion on this count if one reads Lyndon Gordon's "Eliot's 
>Early Years". I got my basic clarity on the subject from it.
>
>CR: Rather than off the cuff, my remark was based on documentation as 
>cited in this excerpt from the Boston Globe:

   A rogues' gallery, I think, of a certain ideological bent and 
willingness to revise, invent, and select "facts" to order. But do you mean 
your clarity comes from the article, not even the works cited? That's a 
definition of off-the-cuff, isn't it?

Ken A.