Print

Print


Dear Cassandra,
    I'm surprised that you characterized Jim McCue's essay as being on 
Lawrence Rainey 's proofreading.  By saying this, you reduce all errors, 
all omissions, all disagreements others have with LR to typos; McCue 
doesn't do that and neither do I in my review.  There are many good 
things in the books, and there are many difficulties.  Proofreading 
alone won't address the problems pointed out, though there is no reason 
the writer or the press has to agree that they are problems.

Best,
Marcia