Print

Print


And it was shot in southern Alberta.
P.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Nancy Gish" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, April 09, 2006 6:42 PM
Subject: Re: Confessions of a "man"-loving woman


> Both are great films.  But if you want romantic, see Brokeback Mountain.
>  (Mountains are in it, but they are not the main topic.)  Neither is
> comedy.  Neither is violent.  Both are thoughtful.
> 
> >>> [log in to unmask] 04/09/06 9:28 PM >>>
>  
> I called my husband on the cell phone yesterday while out during the day
>  and 
> asked what he wanted to do during the evening, as we had no plans.  He 
> said 
> that he already took care of that, that he had went to the video store
> and  
> took out the new Pride and Prejudice that had just come out on video
> that I had  
> been longing to see.  Well, it was very sweet of my husband, but  it was
> an 
> extremely poor, pathetic adaptation, and I can't  believe that it had
> been 
> nominated for Academy Awards.  The one before this  one, I really loved,
> the one 
> before that was great also, and the book best of  all, but this film was
> simply 
> awful.  And, this is truth, and not  politics. My husband asked me today
> what 
> I wanted to see the next time he  was at the video store, and I couldn't
> make 
> up my mind between Good Night and  Good Luck and that mountain film,
> Broback 
> Mountain, I think it's called.   Anyone have any great suggestion,
> keeping in 
> mind that I like thoughtful(but not  violent) and that I like
> romantic(when 
> well done), and comedy only when  extremely well done.
>  
> Regards,
>  
> Kate
>  
> In a message dated 4/9/2006 5:55:13 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
> [log in to unmask] writes:
> 
> Dear  Gunnar,
> 
> How wonderfully 17th C politically correct you are.  How  comfortable to
> 
> choose what is nice and ignore all the reasons others are  offended. 
> How 
> soothingly normal to remain the norm and to be in the  category of the
> those whose 
> politics are truth and not politics.
> 
> How  politic to be so political in so ancient a way.
> 
> As for das  Ewigweibliche, for god's sake, read deBeauvoir (no need to
> read 
> anything too  new)  and notice some changes in that politically correct 
> definition of  all non-male humanity.  Nothing has been more politically
> correct in 
> all  of history as the political definition of women as not the
> "inclusive" and 
> men  as the norm of humanity.  
> 
> I am astonished that you care so much  about all other groups who have
> been 
> historically excluded, and now you  champion militant masculinism and
> resort to 
> such absurd ostensible reasons, or  rather personal assertions.
> Nancy
> 
> 
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.4.0/304 - Release Date: 4/7/2006
> 
>