The sleek Brazilian jaguar
Deos not in its aboreal gloom
Distill so rank a feline smell
As Grishkin in a drawing room.

When the bridegroom smoothed his hair
There was blood upon the bed.
Morning was already late.
Children singing in the orchard
(Io Hymen, HymenŠe)
Succuba eviscerate.

Published in Facsimile:

Leaving the bubbling beverage to cool,
Fresca slips softly to the needful stool,
Where the pathetic tale of Richardson
Eases her labour until the deed is done.
                . . . 

Fresca! in other time or place had been
A meek and lowly weeping Magdalene;
More sinned against than sinning, bruised of marred,
The lazy laughing Jenny of the bard.
(The same eternal and consuming itch
Can make a martyr or plain simple bitch);
Or prudent sly domestic puss puss cat,
Or Autumn's favourite in a furnished flat,
Or strolling slattern in a tawdry gown,
A doorstep dunged by every dog in town.

[It was Pound who removed this stuff from TWL.]

>>> [log in to unmask] 09/12/05 9:23 AM >>>
' I see echoes of Swift in TSE's image of women: for
instance both of them were bothered by the fact that
women had bodily functions '

I remember a stanza from Swift that Lawrence quoted
often which went like this:

'but celia s***s...' (to rhyme with spits)

Can't remember a similar kind of repulsion in Eliot
though !  Can you throw some light?

--- "Loucks, James" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Hi Ken,  --  It's been entertaining to see the
> brouhaha over the last decade over TSE, involving as
> it did M. Hastings, Tom Paulin, Raine, et al. I
> think it was a salutary thing because it aired
> issues that had been lurking and needed to be outed,
> including TSE's alleged misogyny.
> Speaking of which, I see echoes of Swift in TSE's
> image of women: for instance both of them were
> bothered by the fact that women had bodily functions
> (Swift once mentioned "periodic filth," if I recall
> correctly). Maybe Swift, like TSE, suffered from
> horror feminae? 
> I  think more needs to be done with TDE's links with
> Augustan figures such as Swift and Pope (whose
> couplets were "pastiched" in the TWL Ms.).  --  Jim
> James Loucks, Ph.D.
> Ohio State University-Newark
> 1179 University Dr.
> Newark, OH 43055-1797
> [log in to unmask] 
> 740.366.9423
> fax 740.366.5047
> ________________________________
> From: T. S. Eliot Discussion forum. on behalf of Ken
> Armstrong
> Sent: Sun 11-Sep-05 6:11 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Craig Raine (was Re: Echoes of Eliot)
> Jim,
> Thanks for this reference to Raine. I took my Sunday
> "free time" and went
> directly to the library to scope out his _In Defence
> of T S Eliot_.  Who
> could resist that title, at least on this list? I'm
> not sure in what way he
> is arch in his defence of TSE -- it all seemed
> rather measured and calm
> (and witty--hope that doesn't mean he's a neocon!  :
> ) --  but he does have
> the merits of being logical and factual to a fault. 
> Very enjoyable. And in
> the often-thought-but-ne'er-so-well-expressed dept.,
> he's read my mind and
> better said it on C. Ricks.  His piece on Salinger
> and _Catcher in the Rye_
> shone real light, too. A pleasure to meet Mr. Raine.
> Cheers,
> Ken A.
> At 12:11 PM 9/10/2005, you wrote:
> >Kate -- I think Kathleen Raine got into religious
> verse in her later years
> >(or am I thinking of another woman poet?). Do you
> know if she is related
> >to Craig Raine, an arch-defender of TSE?  --  Jim
> Loucks

Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005