Print

Print


I don't remember the context, but it seemed to me at the time
that there shouldn't have been an apostrophe at all. It was like the 
attached.

Cheers,
Peter

George Carless wrote:

>>For the same reason it took the assorted listers several days recently to discern the difference between
>>"printer's" and "printers' " [as in marks (rather than MARX)].
>>    
>>
>
>Actually, that's not true.  The context was not given, and it wasn't clear whether "printer's" or 
>"printers'" would have been correct.  
>
>--George
>
>
>  
>