Revisionist Histories: Memory and Forgetting
A Panel Discussion 
at the Eighth International Literature and Humanities Conference,
INSCRIPTIONS '05: an arts and culture conference and festival
at Eastern Mediterranean University
in Famagusta, on the island of Cyprus
May 12th - 13th, 2005

"Reading. is a belated and all-but-impossible act, and if 
strong is always a  misreading. [.] The strong reader, 
whose readings will matter to others as well as to  
himself, is thus placed in the dilemmas of the revisionist, 
who wishes to find his own original relation to truth, 
whether in texts or in reality (which he treats as texts  
anyway), but also wishes to open received texts to his 
own sufferings, or what he wants to call the sufferings of history" 
(Harold Bloom, A Map of Misreading [Oxford, 1975], pp. 3-4). 
"All history. must more or less blindly encounter the problem of 
a transferential relation to the past whereby the processes at work 
in the object of study acquire their displaced analogues in the 
historian's account" 
(Dominick LaCapra, History & Criticism [Cornell, 1985], p. 11). 

Representations of history are so unstable that to maintain their 
mimetic force, their (experienced or constructed) links with 
land and people, with the real, they must constantly be reinforced 
by political decisions enforcing closure and limiting the proliferation 
of meanings. Fear, acknowledged or not, of the wantonness 
of language-of the play of words, of the potential loss of 
the real-underlies every national history textbook and every 
state education system, and to maintain the presence of the real, 
this fear is inscribed, either explicitly or implicitly, on the memories 
and memorials of every nation: I will not forget! 

Submissions exploring the relation between the real and its 
representations are invited for a Panel Discussion on the 
textual-historiographical processes by which the presence 
of "lived experience" is maintained as such or reconfigured 
in literature/texts/acts by historical agents and historians. 
(While it is not the specific focus of this panel, we also 
welcome presentations of this nature regarding the island of Cyprus, 
the venue of our discussion-a critical, generative space where 
the criteria and parameters of "truth" and historical representation 
have always been politically and emotionally charged; and where 
the inscription of a question mark may have the force 
of a critical interpolation.)

                Some possible topic areas (others are welcome): 

-cultural amnesia and creations of fictionalized identity 
-history as narrative/literature: White, de Certeau, Rancière 
-hermeneutic ripples: reconstruction/construction/deconstruction 
-theological models of history: between Löwith and Blumenberg 
-universalism, particularism and problems of relation in history 
-trauma, repression and transference in history (LaCapra) 
-redemption/eschatology/teleology: the end of history 
    (Fukuyama, Niethammer) 
-periodization and problems of origin and destiny 
-Feyerabend, Bachelard, Kuhn, Popper, and paradigms of 
    scientific progress 
-history and/as system, progress, reason, freedom, anarchy 
-historical intentionality: Barthes, Foucault, Derrida 
-race, class, gender, nation, and narration 
-the conception of history in Jena Romanticism 
-modern historical time: the Annales historians 
-history and the public sphere: Arendt, Habermas, Cottereau 
-"New Historicism": intersections between history and literature 
-Lyotard's "postmodern condition" and historical 
    "grand narratives" 
-microhistories: Alltagsgeschichte (Medick) and 
    microstoria (Ginzburg, Poni) 
-rethinking social categories and organizations: Kocka, 
    Wehler, Grendi, Levi 
-Walter Benjamin, history, and aesthetics 
-politics and intellectual history: Pocock, Skinner, Koselleck 
-history and symbols: Hunt, Furet, Ozouf, Agulhon, Sewell 
-epistemological/prescriptive validity and truth: history as 
-history, culture, system: Geertz, Weber, Bourdieu, Passeron, 
    Cerutti, Luhmann 
-new technologies and the recording/framing of history 
-the persistence of memory: the work of Pierre Nora and Henry Rousso 
-historiographical forensics: evidence and exemplarity 

Prospective panelists are invited to send 250-word abstracts/proposals 
for 15-20 minute presentations on any aspect of these areas to 
[log in to unmask] by 11th February, 2005. 
I look forward to learning about your research, 
and to a provocative discussion. 
For more information about INSCRIPTIONS '05, 
please visit our website at 
Please also check out our links to "Individual Research Presentations" 
and "Creative/Performance Work."

The German Studies Call for Papers List
Editor: Stefani Engelstein
Assistant Editor:  Meghan McKinstry
Sponsored by the University of Missouri
Info available at: