Print

Print


It's in a review of BAUDELAIRE AND THE SYMBOLISTS Peter Quennell
(Chattoe & Windus) 7s 6d net. :)

It's in CRITERION 9.35(Jan 1930):357-358.

Very useful right now.
Thanks a bunch.
Cheers,
Peter
----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Montgomery" <[log in to unmask]>
To: "T. S. Eliot Discussion forum." <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, November 22, 2004 2:01 AM
Subject: Re: Eliot on Arthur Symons


> Thanks to you both.
> P.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Rickard A. Parker" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Monday, November 22, 2004 1:31 AM
> Subject: Re: Eliot on Arthur Symons
>
>
> Nancy may have it.  On the net I see a date of 1930 given for
> this statement.
>
>
> Nancy Gish wrote:
> >
> > Maybe the Criterion, January 1930.
>
> >
> > >>> [log in to unmask] 11/22/04 12:53 AM >>>
> > Anyone know the source of this excerpt?
> >
> > "I myself owe Mr Symons a great debt; but for having read his
> >  book I should not, in the year 1908, have heard of Laforgue or
> >  Rimbaud; I should probably not have begun to read Verlaine;
> >  and but for reading Verlaine, I should not have heard of
> >  Corbière. So the Symons book is one of those which have
> >  affected the course of my life." - T.S.Eliot
>