Sara Trevisan wrote:
> Paradoxically, I think Eliot best explained what an object correlative is
> when he didn't mention it at all but just described it in 'Tradition and the
> Individual Talent'.

Sara, I was doing a search for some information on Eliot and the Pali
language right after reading your post on the 'objective correlative'
and I came upon this serendipitous find of Eliot commenting upon the
fact that he may not have been the first to use the phrase.

    "It is a great many years since I coined, as I thought, the phrase
    'objective correlative'. ... It is a little difficult to say positively,
    one way or another, whether what I meant some 35 years ago by the
    phrase corresponds to the analysis of the author of Vibhava.  ...
    I must confess that I am neither quite sure of what I meant 35 years
    ago, nor sure of what the Sanskrit philosopher meant a good deal
    longer ago than that"

    Cited with "Letter from Eliot to Nimai Chatterji, quoted in a letter to
    the editor of The New Statesman, 5 March 1965, p. 361".

This was from an article printed in "Philosophy East & West."  More
detail can be seen on the online rendition of it at

I'd love to get more information about this.  Can anyone supply
anything more?

    Rick Parker