Print

Print


PLEASE PLEASE GET OFF PETER MONTGOMERY'S BACK--HE IS THE ONLY ONE WHO DID
NOT ALLOW HIS BRAIN TO GO SOFT IN THE PSEUDO-RAREFIED ATMOSPHERE OF THIS
SOPHOMORIC "CLASS".

Jacek
----- Original Message -----
From: "Marcia Karp" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 8:25 PM
Subject: Re: OT: Eden


> Peter Montgomery wrote:
>
> >From: Nancy Gish
> >
> >Would not the meaning of "knowing Jesus" and hence "following after" him
> >depend precisely on how one defined him?  And so one might see Jesus
> >as a human who represents how we are all the [children] of god and to
> >"follow" would be something other than to believe in Christ's divinity.
> >That is, is it not simply circular to say that to be a Christian is to
> >know that Jesus is divine and so to believe in his divinity because
> >that is to be Christian?
> >
> >I have no stake in the answer; I'm just curious about the seeming
> >circularity that depends on having an answer in advance.
> >====================================================
> >straw manning it again Nancy?
> >
> >How convenient to be able to set up the bowling pins to your own
> >preference, and then to walk away from it.
> >
> >Cheers,
> >Peter
> >
> >
> >
>
> Enough, Peter.    Why do you think your foolishly-written attacks on
> Nancy are of any interest to others?  I'm sick of you putting the rest
> of us in the position of being a witness to your stupid and
> self-inflated nastiness.  It is because Will praised you that you are
> annoyed that Nancy has joined the conversation?
>
> Marcia