Print

Print


You're a cheap date, Cornelius. Don't be amazed. It could be grimmer.

--On Wednesday, April 30, 2003 11:39 AM -0400 Cornelius Kingston
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Ken,
>    Grammar again!  I was amazed to see your message contain the following:
>
> "It is not I who has trouble understanding your statements,Nancy, but
> you". Shouldn't it read "who have trouble"?
>
>
>
>
>
> At 07:51 AM 4/30/03 -0500, you wrote:
>
> Ken Armstrong wrote:
>>
>> At 11:40 PM 4/29/2003 -0400, you wrote:
>>
>> This amounts to no better than the same logical contradiction as your
>> original putting of it. It's not I who has trouble understanding your
>> statements, Nancy, but you. Let me explain it for you. Only someone who
>> doesn't assent to "those larger things" could formulate the assertion
>> that you have.
>
> Let me explain A. A.
>
> Wonderful logic.
>
> Please explain your proposition in some way other than merely repeating
> it.
>
> What is your explanation?
>
> Carrol
>