Print

Print


Dear Rick,

By "simultaneously" I mean in 1922 at approximately the same time; I 
should have said "almost simultaneously."  I assume it took a month or 
more by sea to send things in any case.

What was sent to the Dial and published in the Criterion was the version 
Pound and Eliot agreed to after all the cuts and editing.  The copy at the 
end of the Facsimile (which is not of the Dial version but of the Boni and 
Liveright book published in December, 1922), however, has at least one 
correction from the Dial because the Dial left out the apostrophe in 
"HURRY UP PLEASE IT'S TIME," (an error most editions persist in 
retaining).  It was in the Criterion, of which TSE was then the editor and so 
would have seen the page proofs.  The book also had the notes for the first 
time; they were not in the Dial or Criterion.  What was sent to Quinn was 
the whole mass of material Pound and TSE had cut and revised, i.e., what 
is now published in the "facsimile."  In that edition, the left side pages are 
simply photocopies of the MSS and typescript, and the right side pages 
are printed versions to be readable.  On 19 July 1922 Eliot wrote the 
following to Quinn:

"I should like to present you the MSS of the Waste Land, if you would care 
to have it--when I say MSS, I mean that it is partly MSS and partly 
typescript, with Ezra's and my alterations scrawled all over it."  

If by "notebook" you mean all that material, it went to Quinn and was not 
the basis of the journal versions or the first edition.  But I have never seen it 
described as a notebook, a term generally used for _Inventions of the 
March Hare_.

The main details are all in the first chapter of my TWL book, but they are 
much more fully described in the notes and intro to the facsimile.  If you 
want to study exactly what came out when, see Gallup's bibliography of 
Eliot, which lists exact dates, etc., and tells the exact form of what was 
included.

Best,
Nancy






Date sent:      	Thu, 5 Jul 2001 10:17:16 -0600
Send reply to:  	[log in to unmask]
From:           	"Richard Seddon" <[log in to unmask]>
To:             	<[log in to unmask]>
Subject:        	Re: Pound and the Wasteland

Nancy:

I thought that the Criterion published in Oct. and Dial in November.

What part of the facsimile is the original draft which was passed to the
Dial and the Criterion.  The text of TWL in the back of the Facsimile is a
copy of the first edition published in New York.  Are you maintaining that
there was no intermediate matter between the annotated notebook and the
final published version?

Or are you saying that TSE sent John Quinn the notebook as the final draft
and that John Quinn put together the published version which was then
published in the Oct issue of Criterion and then in Nov in Dial?

Rick Seddon
McIntosh, NM, USA

-----Original Message-----
From: Nancy Gish <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Thursday, July 05, 2001 9:49 AM
Subject: Re: Pound and the Wasteland


The poem was published simultaneously in the Criterion and Dial in 1922.
The original was sent to John Quinn.  The Facsmimile is a copy of that
original.  As Rick pointed out, all the history of it is in that edition.
Nancy




Date sent:      Thu, 5 Jul 2001 09:29:28 -0600
Send reply to:  [log in to unmask]
From:           "Richard Seddon" <[log in to unmask]>
To:             <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:        Re: Pound and the Wasteland

Kate:

Are we sure of the context within which TSE gave EP the notebook?  Could
it have been a casual "I'm not sure what I've got here but it's driving me
crazy.  I can't seem to get it right.  See what you think".  Neither Pound
nor TSE may have been aware of the mother lode which TSE had asked 
EP to
dig in.  Then again it might have been simply a gesture of friendship,
done on the spur of the moment by TSE to continue a literary link with
Pound who had given up on the London scene.  TSE might have had no idea
what Pound would hand back to him.  Their immediate subsequent written
conversations reflect a rather pleased surprise to me.  They seem almost
boyishly strutting.  But then Pound often seems to be strutting.

Pound was very much used by many authors as a sounding board for their
work.  In fact someone has said that a superb writing course could be had
for ream of paper, some stamped envelopes and Pound's address.

The very final draft of TWL had to have been given to Criterion Magazine I
would think.  I am as curious as you about what went between the marked up
notebook that Pound gave back to TSE and what we have as TWL.  There are
many suppositions of sequences out there but no absolutes.  John Quinn
would have gotten a copy exactly that of the Criterion version plus the
appended notes.  Perhaps an intermediate version lies with the drafts of
the notes where ever those are.

Rick Seddon
McIntosh, NM, USA
    -----Original Message-----
    From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
    To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
    Date: Thursday, July 05, 2001 8:50 AM
    Subject: Re: Pound and the Wasteland




    Anyway, I perused that web site - the one which contained
    several different takes on Pound's editing of and influence on the
    Waste Land.  What struck me is that Eliot allowed Pound to take such
    liberties with his work.  Usually, a writer is extremely wary of
    another author even seeing his work before publication.  Obviously,
    they were friends and Eliot trusted Pound.  I wonder, who has the
    original final draft of the Waste Land.  Was it lost or was it a part
    of Eliot's Estate.